“It is a copy editor’s duty to deploy the serial comma, along with lots of other lip-smacking bits of punctuation, as a bulwark against barbarianism.”
– Mary Norris
I support the Oxford Comma.
Some of you are giving me a virtual fist-bump. Others are rolling their eyes. Some of you are shrugging your shoulders and going back to web-surfing.
For those still reading, here’s why I prefer the Oxford Comma, which is also known as the serial comma: it makes reading easier and, more importantly, clearer.
I’m not alone in my appreciation for the Oxford Comma. Milk truck drivers in Maine are also fans, after winning $10 million in back-pay for overtime in a lawsuit that came down to a missing comma.
In her overview of the case, The New Yorker’s celebrated copy editor, Mary Norris—aka the Comma Queen—wrote last week that the legal decision “has warmed the hearts of punctuation enthusiasts everywhere.” At The New Yorker, you see, “it is a copy editor’s duty to deploy the serial comma, along with lots of other lip-smacking bits of punctuation, as a bulwark against barbarianism.”
Grammarly says it’s a stylistic choice in most cases (some style guides require its use, others do not), but offers an example of when the Oxford Comma can make a big difference. Which sentence is clearer?
I love my parents, Lady Gaga, and Humpty Dumpty.
The Oxford Dictionaries, unsurprisingly, are in favor of the Oxford Comma, explaining that “the last comma can serve to resolve ambiguity.”
I’ve chosen my side: I’m with the Comma Queen. Whose side are you on?
Find this stuff as fun as I do? Click here for Mary Norris’ video series for The New Yorker, including this short video about why the Oxford Comma is useful–and when it may be okay to leave it out.